презентация по русскому языку диктант на тему школа
Главное меню:
Интересное
презентация по русскому языку диктант на тему школа, Graphic artists in China push back on AI and its averaging , Digital Artists Are Pushing Back Against AI - Hyperallergic, Artists push back against AI dolls with their own creations, Graphics Artists In China Push Back On AI and Its Averaging , When AI-Generated Art Enters the Market, Consumers Win — and , AI companies are being sued by artists | The Week, Starter pack, but make it human”: artists push back against .
Graphic artists in China push back on AI and its averaging effect | The VergeSkip to main contentHamburger Navigation ButtonHamburger Navigation ButtonNavigation DrawerThe VergeThe Verge logo.Login / Sign UpcloseCloseSearchTechExpandReviewsExpandScienceExpandEntertainmentExpandCarsExpandVideosExpandPodcastsExpandNewslettersExpandSubscribeGraphic artists in China push back on AI and its averaging effectComments DrawerGraphic artists in China push back on AI and its averaging effect‘It forces both designers and clients to rethink the value of designers.’‘It forces both designers and clients to rethink the value of designers.’by Jun 27, 2025, 12:00 PM UTCLinkFacebookThreadsImage: Jackson Gibbs / The VergePart OfFutureproofsee all Sendi Jia, a designer running her own studio between Beijing, China, and London, England, says she mainly uses AI generators like to make fake photos for background panels or websites when her clients don’t have access to real ones. That’s helped clients with limited budgets, but it’s also exposed just how much of the creative process AI can replace. Recently, a potential client working in a university contacted Jia about creating the logo for a new project. Then, they changed their mind. They had used AI to make it, they said.Chinese graphic artists are rapidly experiencing the impact of image generators on their day-to-day work: the technology enables copycats and profoundly shifts clients’ perception of their work, specifically in terms of how much that work costs and how much time it takes to produce. Freelance artists or designers working in industries with clients that invest in stylized, eye-catching graphics, like advertising, are particularly at risk.Long before AI image generators became popular, graphic designers at major tech companies and in-house designers for large corporate clients were often instructed by managers to crib aesthetics from competitors or from social media, according to one employee at a major online shopping platform in China, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation from their employer.Where a human would need to understand and reverse engineer a distinctive style to recreate it, AI image generators simply create randomized mutations of it. Often, the results will look like obvious copies and include errors, but other graphic designers can then edit them into a final product.“I think it’d be easier to replace me if I didn’t embrace [AI],” the shopping platform employee says. Early on, as tools like Stable Diffusion and Midjourney became more popular, their colleagues who spoke English well were selected to study AI image generators to increase in-house expertise on how to write successful prompts and identify what types of tasks AI was useful for. Ultimately, it was useful for copying styles from popular artists that, in the past, would take more time to study. “I think it forces both designers and clients to rethink the value of designers,” Jia says. “Is it just about producing a design? Or is it about consultation, creativity, strategy, direction, and aesthetic?”“You might get a good result, but there will inevitably be dozens or even hundreds of poor ones … Personally, I see [AI image generators] as more of a toy than a tool.”At ad agencies, for example, graphic designers work on comprehensive strategies for campaigns, aiming to create iconic, recognizable visual identities across a variety of formats. As such, AI image generators are less useful because they don’t produce anything particularly unique, according to Erbing, a graphic designer in Beijing who has worked with several ad agencies and asked to be called by his nickname.“Each project faces different problems, and designers are there to solve specific problems, not to create identical visuals,” he says. “Sometimes, the process of thinking through a project takes longer than actually creating the visuals.”When faced with more complex tasks, AI’s utility dwindles. Image generators are capable of creating many images, but that does not replace the work of understanding what an ad campaign needs to establish a visual identity and communicate what it is the client is selling and why people should buy it. Then, translating those concepts to the AI productively is its own challenge. Among graphic designers in China, there’s a joke that using an AI image generator is like , referring to where users spend money to receive randomized items and find out what they won.“You might get a good result, but there will inevitably be dozens or even hundreds of poor ones,” Erbing says. “Personally, I see [AI image generators] as more of a toy than a tool.”Across the board, though, artists and designers say that AI hype has negatively impacted clients’ view of their work’s value. Now, clients expect a graphic designer to produce work on a shorter timeframe and for less money, which also has its own averaging impact, lowering the ceiling for what designers can deliver. As clients lower budgets and squish timelines, the quality of the designers’ output decreases.“There is now a significant misperception about the workload of designers,” Erbing says. “Some clients think that since AI must have improved efficiency, they can halve their budget.”But this perception runs contrary to what designers spend the majority of their time doing, which is not necessarily just making any image, Erbing says.Erbing, like other designers, hopes AI image generators can become more useful to graphic designers in the future, and notes that people’s perception of their usefulness outpaces their actual application. In the meanwhile, it is twisting the clients’ view of the usefulness of the artists themselves.See More: More in FutureproofSee allHollywood’s pivot to AI video has a prompting problemCharles Pulliam-MooreTwo hours agoCommentsComment Icon BubbleAI is ruining houseplant communities onlineNicole FroioJun 26CommentsComment Icon BubbleThe photographer using AI to reconstruct stories lost to censorshipElise MortonJun 25CommentsComment Icon BubbleMost PopularMost PopularInstallerA weekly newsletter by David Pierce designed to tell you everything you need to download, watch, read, listen to, and explore that fits in The Verge’s universe.Email (required)Sign UpBy submitting your email, you agree to our and . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.More in Reddit turns 20, and it’s going big on AIDid AI companies win a fight with authors? TechnicallyFacebook is starting to feed its AI with private, unpublished photosRunway is going to let people generate video games with AIGoogle’s carbon emissions went up again as its AI push continuesGoogle’s Doppl app took off my socksReddit turns 20, and it’s going big on AIJay PetersJun 28CommentsComment Icon BubbleDid AI companies win a fight with authors? TechnicallyAdi RobertsonJun 28CommentsComment Icon BubbleFacebook is starting to feed its AI with private, unpublished photosTina NguyenJun 27CommentsComment Icon BubbleRunway is going to let people generate video games with AIAlex HeathJun 27CommentsComment Icon BubbleGoogle’s carbon emissions went up again as its AI push continuesEmma Roth and Justine CalmaJun 27CommentsComment Icon BubbleGoogle’s Doppl app took off my socksEmma RothJun 27CommentsComment Icon BubbleTop StoriesTwo hours agoThe unbearable obviousness of AI fitness summaries12:30 PM UTC‘We are the media now’12:00 PM UTCApple’s racing movie is finally hereJun 28The Supreme Court just upended internet law, and I have questionsTwo hours agoHollywood’s pivot to AI video has a prompting problemJun 27How vulnerable is critical infrastructure to cyberattack in the US?ContactTip UsCommunity GuidelinesAboutEthics StatementHow We Rate and Review ProductsCookie SettingsTerms of UsePrivacy NoticeCookie PolicyLicensing FAQAccessibilityPlatform Status© 2025 Vox Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved, Copycats, unrealistic expectations, and budget cuts are AI’s gifts to graphic artists., Digital Artists Are Pushing Back Against AI Using the hashtag “No to AI Art,” artists protest AI image generators’ use of their work without permission or compensation. Verity Babbs March 6 .
Artists and creatives are pushing back against a recent trend using artificial intelligence (AI) to generate "starter pack" images of people as toys - which they say may be in danger of risking , Graphic artists in China are pushing back against AI image generators, which they say "profoundly shifts clients' perception of their work, specifically in terms of how much that work costs and how much time it takes to produce," reports The Verge. "Freelance artists or designers working in industri, The results were striking: Once generative AI (GenAI) entered the market, the total number of images for sale skyrocketed, while the number of human-generated images fell dramatically. On the flip side, consumers showed a taste for the influx of AI-generated images, choosing GenAI images over human-generated ones., Some creatives have grown impatient waiting for governments to step in and are banding together to push back against AI companies with a flurry of lawsuits., In response to the rise of AI-generated art, artists worldwide are reclaiming creativity by producing hand-drawn 'starter packs' that celebrate individuality and human creativity. This article explores how artists are pushing back against the AI trend and highlighting the value of traditional artistry., .