текст для списывания 3 класс 3 четверть школа россии
Главное меню:
Интересное
текст для списывания 3 класс 3 четверть школа россии, Effects of Polarized Training vs. Other Training Intensity Distribution , The Effect of Polarized Training Intensity Distribution on Maximal , Comparison of Polarized Versus Other Types of Endurance Training , Research Review: Effects of Polarized vs. Other Training Intensity , Frontiers | Effects of Different Training Intensity Distribution in , Effects of 16Â weeks of pyramidal and polarized training intensity , The effect of training distribution, duration, and volume on VO2max and .
6g:ІO]tG.#< {q30WwiQyՙ{yOh~$Okܘ6?.qچ&fF{8Nכ7gm t߅V\TΣckEe^g+~?.cxkFmG+~?V9: 5/Ey-"Xq Ⱦu^-#Ҵ/7[EP*U0)'s֣CβO-ȀiC4|cΣBo?t{+w F ɮ:վ)3H҄vFsQ((Je%1ABP1(bϏHjV_Dʯ3D-j+jcVRtQV2-egx/J/_GU^Q1P2T\J%YkHD/i&}z'L :bg:QMz7 x+o?]P@P@ -GڶkC}NN7qDle af]NYNG\PρN YݿWÖSٹK L(1_}h('\4P@P@P@P@s?3XvtOXE|#gS~fH X/ZePGڨdTdPzS @P֤ oȡה -kIlnlEZ, J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2024—This scoping review aimed to analyze the long-term effects of polarized training (POL) on key endurance physiological- and performance-related variables and to systematically compare them with other training intensity distribution (TID) models in endurance athletes of different performance levels., The objective of this review was to systematically search the literature in order to identify the effects of polarized training intensity distribution on VO2max, peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), and work economy among endurance athletes. A literature search was performed using PubMed and SPORTDiscus..
Abstract Background Polarized training intensity distribution (POL) was recently suggested to be superior to other training intensity distribution (TID) regimens for endurance performance improvement., BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front) This scoping review compared the long-term effects of Polarized Training (POL) with other Training Intensity Distribution (TID) models—Pyramidal (PYR), Threshold (THR), and Block Training (BT)—on endurance performance and physiological adaptations. In endurance athletes ranging from trained to world-class (Tiers 2–5), POL and PYR models were generally more , Runners recruited were randomly assigned to 2 different training models based on HR intensity detected with maximal test. The percentage distribution splitted in zone 1, 2, and 3 were by 77/3/20 and 40/50/10 in polarized endurance training group (PET) and focused endurance training (FOC) group, respectively., Endurance coaches, athletes and scientists strive to find the best combination of intensity, duration and frequency of training sessions1 to achieve the desired physiological adaptation for athletes and the best performance during main competitions.2,3 Manipulating these variables dif-ferently over time is traditionally referred to as training , This review reports that the optimization of training in well trained cyclists cannot be solely explained by the training intensity distribution model and an individualized approach that considers the physiological and competitive requirements of the athlete is justified., ABSTRACT Background: Endurance sports demand a finely-tuned balance between training intensity and volume to optimize athletic performance. Training Intensity Distribution has become a critical training parameter in endurance sports, potentially eliciting superior physiological adaptations and improving overall performance outcomes. Training intensity distribution influences the body's aerobic .